4 ms·
Have you looked into using ets storage instead of bitcask storage? Millions of keys at ~12bytes value would fit just fine in memory without the bitcask overhead
by slysf 15y ago
Have you looked into using ets storage instead of bitcask storage? Millions of keys at ~12bytes value would fit just fine in memory without the bitcask overhead and as long as your N value is > 1 you shouldn't have to worry about data loss unless your whole cluster loses power.