5 ms·
>I'm trying to think what's changed SO used to have really god content for really some fundamental questions which gave it some credibility. As it accumulates
by reader_mode 5y ago
>I'm trying to think what's changed
SO used to have really god content for really some fundamental questions which gave it some credibility. As it accumulates more content the quality is really going down - I actively avoid SO unless I can't find any other source.
GitHub - literally every problem I have nowdays I spend searching through GH issues, reading through the code upstream and reporting back. For example I was working with .NET framework for a while (~5-6 years back now) and when dealing with closed source frameworks SO was a replacement for support channels. Now even as I'm coming back to a .NET core project - everything is OSS and on GitHub.
Docs also got better, MDN is now defunded by mozilla but where I had to do a SO search for random JS behavior I can now look up decent references on MDN. I think Google got better at indexing documentation as well.
- user1234567890 5y ago> I think Google got better at indexing documentation as well I think this is it. I also thing documentation in general has gotten a lot better at answering questions rather than being just an autogen api doc site.
- Noumenon72 5y ago> SO used to have really god content for really some fundamental questions which gave it some credibility. The moderators' refusal to allow "opinion-based" questions has been very harmful to the usefulness of the site. Now you can only find best practices if someone happens to add them as a tangent. Or if you happen on an old one that got 1000+ upvotes before the mods decided theory was off topic.