3 ms·
It's pretty funny to see the economist, founded in economic liberalism and against a rural idle aristocracy, semi-chearing-on more government-subsidized shit su
by Ericson2314 6y ago
It's pretty funny to see the economist, founded in economic liberalism and against a rural idle aristocracy, semi-chearing-on more government-subsidized shit suburbanization.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Hammershaft 6y agoThe economist has railed against suburbs before, and yes, overreaching suburbs built on massive sparse infrastructure is a huge problem, but this needs to be weighed against other huge problems that have developed in american economic geography, like how the economic gains of technology have accrued almost entirely to a handful of cities with sky high rents.
- Ericson2314 6y agoThe solution is to build more city. Denser areas will always be wealthier, just denser chips will always be faster.