> SGX. This in itself is its own can of worms, but assuming it's secure It likely doesn't really add much security. Anyone capable of running processes on the

> SGX. This in itself is its own can of worms, but assuming it's secure It likely doesn't really add much security. Anyone capable of running processes on the chip hosting the SGX enclave can probably run a side-channel attack to recover the necessary keys. I was very disappointed that Signal took that approach.