The difference here is social platforms claim they are not publishers under section 230. "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treat

The difference here is social platforms claim they are not publishers under section 230. "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" Therefore the correlation does not work. Part of the intent for section 230 was to allow free open discussion without the platform being liable. But once they begin to curate the content ( nice way to say censor ) they are no longer performing under section 230.