META: So assuming a judge rules against/or for, a given case seen before them, What qualifications beyond them simply being a judge, provides them to be the aut

META: So assuming a judge rules against/or for, a given case seen before them, What qualifications beyond them simply being a judge, provides them to be the authoritative answer ons [subject] So, this judge, rules around data, so we have a singular individual who has been given creedence to state how billions of interactions may be viewed, legally... I am not casting opinion on any of this - I am simply asking; "Is it wise to have a single 'judge' at the helm of transactions that effect billions?