4 ms·
I wouldn't attribute it solely on moderation though. The HN audience isn't very big and thread discussions never last too long because there's almost always som
by seumars 5y ago
I wouldn't attribute it solely on moderation though. The HN audience isn't very big and thread discussions never last too long because there's almost always something on the frontpage. Not saying it's a bad thing though.
- b1gtech 5y agoI think HN has God Mod syndrome. HN is good due to the network effect, not the heavy hand.
- Oddskar 5y agoHN is probably the only place that maintained its quality somewhat over the last 10 years for me. So many websites and subreddits blew up, grew too quickly, and burned out in quality. I think a lot can be attributed to strict moderation, but also like you say being pretty niche helps in that the mod team doesn't have to be very big.
- elliekelly 5y agoI think it’s also that HN is optimized for “interesting” rather than for eyeballs and outrage.
- atat7024 5y agoIt's actually DEoptimized for outrage, if one reads the guidelines closely.
- dang 5y agoHN gets 1400-ish submissions and 12,000-ish comments a day, and 5M-ish users a month. Whether that's big depends on what you're comparing it to. It's big to us.
- nick__m 5y agoThe ratio of submissions/comments is impressively high, this surely explains why the upvoted articles are almost always interesting. Thanks for all that work!