I genuinely think that you are missing the author's point, and thus precisely not the target of this article. In my reading of the article, I did not get the i

I genuinely think that you are missing the author's point, and thus precisely not the target of this article. In my reading of the article, I did not get the impression that the author is opposed to the specific, discrete components of the job that he found "lame". If the demands of the article are truly impossible (socially and/or economically), then I believe that is the *point*, not a criticism of this post.