3 ms·
This is super neat. Not only for beginners/intermediate to catch up with documented and undocumented features. But also for platforms who are seeking a better m
by shoto_io 6y ago
This is super neat. Not only for beginners/intermediate to catch up with documented and undocumented features. But also for platforms who are seeking a better moderation approach. For me, HN is a very special place - the way people interact, the way that it is moderated. I still dream that other platforms might follow suit someday.
- seumars 6y agoI wouldn't attribute it solely on moderation though. The HN audience isn't very big and thread discussions never last too long because there's almost always something on the frontpage. Not saying it's a bad thing though.
- b1gtech 6y agoI think HN has God Mod syndrome. HN is good due to the network effect, not the heavy hand.
- Oddskar 6y agoHN is probably the only place that maintained its quality somewhat over the last 10 years for me. So many websites and subreddits blew up, grew too quickly, and burned out in quality. I think a lot can be attributed to strict moderation, but also like you say being pretty niche helps in that the mod team doesn't have to be very big.
- elliekelly 6y agoI think it’s also that HN is optimized for “interesting” rather than for eyeballs and outrage.
- atat7024 6y agoIt's actually DEoptimized for outrage, if one reads the guidelines closely.
- dang 6y agoHN gets 1400-ish submissions and 12,000-ish comments a day, and 5M-ish users a month. Whether that's big depends on what you're comparing it to. It's big to us.
- nick__m 6y agoThe ratio of submissions/comments is impressively high, this surely explains why the upvoted articles are almost always interesting. Thanks for all that work!