4 ms·
> Are you arguing that Iran is more safe due to the fact they lock up less people? No, I'm stating the fact that the nytimes (and the like) will repeat US gov
by dls2016 5y ago
> Are you arguing that Iran is more safe due to the fact they lock up less people?
No, I'm stating the fact that the nytimes (and the like) will repeat US gov propaganda about how Iran/terrorist-org-du-jour is so authoritarian that we need to "fight them over there to protect our way of life over here"... while nytimes (and the like) completely ignores the story of how our police are trained. And if you google "killology" for ten seconds, I think you'd agree a great way to describe it is "authoritarian".
> You think less police and less incarceration will suddenly make the US a less dangerous place?
No, it will take time. I mean there are entire generations of black males missing from their familial units. That kind of trauma don't heal "suddenly".
- CountDrewku 5y ago"No, it will take time. I mean there are entire generations of black males missing from their familial units. That kind of trauma don't heal "suddenly"." So, leaving criminal black males with their familial units will fix it then? You realize children raised with abusive (possibly violent) parents are statistically more likely to turn into criminals too right? Just having a father figure present doesn't suddenly mean things will improve.