3 ms·
> I think realistically they are in the business of making O&G cheaper to extract through efficiencies that gain some climate merit (but very little). It's more
by ramary 5y ago
> I think realistically they are in the business of making O&G cheaper to extract through efficiencies that gain some climate merit (but very little). It's more like the limited climate benefit is an add-on to core business.
Respectfully, this is not the business we are in, but I understand how our current messaging could convey it that way. That being said, there is a strong incentive to build products that both address climate pollution and reduce costs. It's a fine line and one that we think about constantly at the company.
- boringg 5y agoTrue my apologies for incorrect statement. The business you are in is IOT for O&G. Ensuring that flaring/leaks are monitored. That said that has some beneficial climate impacts but is mostly a worker safety issue and a regulatory infraction problem. A balancing act for sure (good products / reducing costs)!