3 ms·
> as you've alluded to, its not open to consumers, only financial institutions, with good reason. It gives you lots of access to do all sorts of things. How so
by selfhoster11 6y ago
> as you've alluded to, its not open to consumers, only financial institutions, with good reason. It gives you lots of access to do all sorts of things.
How so? There's no reason a bank account shouldn't be programmable. If the worry is fraud and account hacks, that already happens when the computer is compromised or people get scammed.
- KaiserPro 6y ago> There's no reason a bank account shouldn't be programmable Agreed. But until we have a better system of plainly showing access levels to one's account its a scammer paradise to allow access via said API. You and I are educated in the world of API access, so will think twice before clicking "agree" to allowing emoji corp access to my bank account to "verify your identity", but a significant number of people would blindly click allow. Until we have either educated the public, or made an access GUI that stops 99.9% of that kind of use case, its just not worth the hassle.
- kolinko 6y ago> But until we have a better system of plainly showing access levels to one's account its a scammer paradise to allow access via said API. Nobody says such API would be connected to a person's life holdings. It could be low amounts that are safe to lose in case of a hack. Of course, you need to educate people to not put all their life savings into those accounts. But the same applies to multiple other services.
- fomine3 6y agoIt looks like "Serveless is wrong word!" discussion. (I agree both)
- pessimizer 6y agoThere's no difference between this and the transfers I can do on my bank's website. If anything, having a government crypto account would mean that the government would know who was on both ends of every transaction made through it, and could trivially reverse payments.