4 ms·

Chdir to cwd: permission denied

• noja 6y ago
  Warning: reader view definitely required!
  • xdrosenheim 6y ago
    Read your comment and thought: "What? Too many ads or something?" Why would someone choose this type of font/styling for a whole article?
    • setr 6y ago
      I mean it’s not bad, but it could definitely use some work — the black highlight is far too large and overused, blasting its way through the article. It needs a secondary “lesser emphasis” styling for code snippets and maybe keep the blackout for real highlights
      • cooper12 6y ago
        They're also using a monospaced font for the body text and aren't limiting the line length.
        • hasheddan 6y ago
          Thanks for y'all's feedback! I'll do my best to improve formatting here so that the reading experience is more enjoyable.
      • Google234 6y ago
        It’s bad. I find it very hard to read
• rascul 6y ago
  It might be worth putting "runc" in the title somewhere. > This post describes a breaking change in runc v1.0.0-rc93, that has subsequently had a workaround implemented that will presumably be included in v1.0.0-rc94.