3 ms·

Yes and severely limited in aesthetical expression.

• CyberDildonics 5y ago
  Before you said it wasn't possible. Now when someone points out it has been already done for a long time you say "severely limited aethetical (not a word) expression".
  • lofi_lory 5y ago
    Where did I say it's not possible? This very article is about 3D printing of clothes. So someone pointed out 3D woven clothes exists, probably didn't really read my comment either. I too had 3D woven clothing in mind in my original first paragraph, when I emphasized the aesthetic benefits of 2D fabrics, over direct 3D fabrication. What's your point, really? Is what I said invalidated, because you assumed some inconsistency off topic? Do you think that's constructive and helpful to discourse and exploring new ideas?
    • CyberDildonics 5y ago
      > The 3D manipulation of 2D fabric is just too finicky Then you went on some tangent about "the future of human freedom".
      • lofi_lory 5y ago
        Yes. That's not 3D woven, is it? Robots aren't sewing jeans, but they can weave some variation of tube like socks or a simple pullover. Anyway, I think you are just trying to fight and feel superior over some pity. Hope you get better. Good night.