4 ms·

> .....but a click-bait article with some easily debunked falsities on a not even released version, just seems to be in bad faith. This article was written 5-d

> .....but a click-bait article with some easily debunked falsities on a not even released version, just seems to be in bad faith. This article was written 5-days after Gnome 40s official release. > Gnome doesn't show you the overview of your open apps or any application shortcuts on its desktop. You need to open Activities - an extra mouse click - before they are shown >>It does, that is like the core feature of gnome. Maybe his/her version was buggy, but it did work even in the Fedora beta version I tried. It absolutely does not, and this authors complaint is mirrored in every other review of Gnome 40. The aforementioned functionality was either removed or the extensions that provided said functionality are broken. The common denominator and undeniable truth with every iteration of Gnome over the last x-years is inherent functionality is neutered and burdened by extension devs.

kaba0 5y ago
> It absolutely does not, and this authors complaint is mirrored in every other review of Gnome 40. We are either talking about something different, or I don’t know. If you press Super or swipe 3 fingers up you get the preview of every app on every desktop. On the picture in the article, the author has no window open (as apparent from the dock not having any “open” icons)
- wander_homer 5y ago
  That's precisely what the author wrote, you just replaced "an extra mouse click" with "press Super or swipe 3 fingers up", hence the additional step to display all running applications still remains with your solution.
  - kaba0 5y ago
    And if you do that, then you have every window’s overview there, so what you and the author writes is false. Would you like a screenshot of it, because that is what I see precisely in front of me?
    - wander_homer 5y ago
      I don't need a screenshot, I have it running here. By default GNOME does not display all running applications on the desktop, you always have to do an extra step (mouse click, hot corner, key press, swipe) and activate the Activities screen, which is not necessary on basically any other desktop system, and that is precisely what the author complained about.
      - kaba0 5y ago
        That’s called not having a taskbar, and has been the case since Gnome 3 (without extensions), so I don’t see how is it relevant under gnome 40. And why would I want to waste vertical space for that, when I can do a really short movement to see them all, in a better digestible form, because humans are better at remembering the position of something
        wander_homer 5y ago
        > That’s called not having a taskbar Or a dock, the one GNOME already implements in its Activities screen. > and has been the case since Gnome 3 (without extensions), so I don’t see how is it relevant under gnome 40. The author never said otherwise, their whole point was to explain, that moving the dock from the left, which is in close range to the hot corner and button to activate the Activities screen, to the bottom, means that you now have to move the mouse a much larger distance if you want to access the dock with the mouse. And since GNOME doesn't support an auto-hiding dock at the bottom, there's no way around that when you use the mouse. I mean I'm just rephrasing what the author already wrote, because I think they made their point pretty clear to begin with. > And why would I want to waste vertical space for that, when I can do a really short movement to see them all, in a better digestible form, because humans are better at remembering the position of something Every other modern and popular desktop on this planet supports auto-hiding docks/panels and nobody asks GNOME to force an always visible dock on you.
        unionpivo 5y ago
        Sure, and it has bugged people like me since release of Gnome 3. Well ... I switched to KDE, so not really bugged by it any more. What he wrote is factually correct (about extra click/gesture/keypress/...), and complaint of many people.
- 3836293648 5y ago
  If the author has no windows open and isn't on the overview that's because the author chose to not be on the overview. GNOME boots into the overview now

kaba0 5y ago

> It absolutely does not, and this authors complaint is mirrored in every other review of Gnome 40. We are either talking about something different, or I don’t know. If you press Super or swipe 3 fingers up you get the preview of every app on every desktop. On the picture in the article, the author has no window open (as apparent from the dock not having any “open” icons)

wander_homer 5y ago
That's precisely what the author wrote, you just replaced "an extra mouse click" with "press Super or swipe 3 fingers up", hence the additional step to display all running applications still remains with your solution.
- kaba0 5y ago
  And if you do that, then you have every window’s overview there, so what you and the author writes is false. Would you like a screenshot of it, because that is what I see precisely in front of me?
  - wander_homer 5y ago
    I don't need a screenshot, I have it running here. By default GNOME does not display all running applications on the desktop, you always have to do an extra step (mouse click, hot corner, key press, swipe) and activate the Activities screen, which is not necessary on basically any other desktop system, and that is precisely what the author complained about.
    - kaba0 5y ago
      That’s called not having a taskbar, and has been the case since Gnome 3 (without extensions), so I don’t see how is it relevant under gnome 40. And why would I want to waste vertical space for that, when I can do a really short movement to see them all, in a better digestible form, because humans are better at remembering the position of something
      - wander_homer 5y ago
        > That’s called not having a taskbar Or a dock, the one GNOME already implements in its Activities screen. > and has been the case since Gnome 3 (without extensions), so I don’t see how is it relevant under gnome 40. The author never said otherwise, their whole point was to explain, that moving the dock from the left, which is in close range to the hot corner and button to activate the Activities screen, to the bottom, means that you now have to move the mouse a much larger distance if you want to access the dock with the mouse. And since GNOME doesn't support an auto-hiding dock at the bottom, there's no way around that when you use the mouse. I mean I'm just rephrasing what the author already wrote, because I think they made their point pretty clear to begin with. > And why would I want to waste vertical space for that, when I can do a really short movement to see them all, in a better digestible form, because humans are better at remembering the position of something Every other modern and popular desktop on this planet supports auto-hiding docks/panels and nobody asks GNOME to force an always visible dock on you.
      - unionpivo 5y ago
        Sure, and it has bugged people like me since release of Gnome 3. Well ... I switched to KDE, so not really bugged by it any more. What he wrote is factually correct (about extra click/gesture/keypress/...), and complaint of many people.
3836293648 5y ago
If the author has no windows open and isn't on the overview that's because the author chose to not be on the overview. GNOME boots into the overview now