3 ms·
> if someone takes 3 months to review a paper I have the exact opposite experience/ problem. Whenever I'm asked to review, there s an artificially short deadli
by tpoacher 6y ago
> if someone takes 3 months to review a paper
I have the exact opposite experience/ problem. Whenever I'm asked to review, there s an artificially short deadline involved (typically a couple of weeks).
Which, assuming you actually work for a living, effectively equates to having a couple of days at the weekend to review a paper.
- mike_hearn 6y agoHmm, interesting. My number comes from a meta-analysis of peer reviews that compared usual latency to COVID-paper latency. However they might have been looking at the delay between the paper being finalised and the review being committed, or something like that. There's presumably a lot of latency added by the journals finding and routing papers to reviewers.