You misunderstood me. You would need to add tests for getters and setters to guarantee that there's no typo in there (I've seen quite some bugs due to this) but

You misunderstood me. You would need to add tests for getters and setters to guarantee that there's no typo in there (I've seen quite some bugs due to this) but it feels like a waste of time. That's why I'm happy that that's not necessary with kotlin. Code coverage is just a control tool.