You are right... I think it might be unsolvable. Nothing stops two people from conspiring to vote in the same direction. Either party A and B decide (off-netwo

You are right... I think it might be unsolvable. Nothing stops two people from conspiring to vote in the same direction. Either party A and B decide (off-network) to vote together, or party A pays party B to vote in the same direction. I don't see a way to solve the problem. Crypto is next-generation wealth redistribution technology, but it is likely that "true decentralization" is a utopia. At the end of the day, people are gonna listen to their family and friends before anyone else, hence vote polarization and pockets of centralization.