3 ms·

Does failing to monitor adequately include jumping in the back seat? There's inattentiveness and reckless endangerment, I think the driver here should be charge

Does failing to monitor adequately include jumping in the back seat? There's inattentiveness and reckless endangerment, I think the driver here should be charged tbh.

utopcell 6y ago
I think the point is that the driver was fully confident that the car would do a much better job at driving compared to them.
ffggvv 6y ago
is it reckless endangerment when elon constantly tells people to do this and says theyre gonna be robotaxis later this year and says autopilot is safer than a human driver and calls it "autopilot"?
- goshx 6y ago
  Elon tells people to jump on the back seat? Is that what you are claiming?
  - ffggvv 6y ago
    he intimates constantly that the driver is only required for regulation purposes and that they dont actually verify youre paying attention or in the drivers seat and calls it "full self driving"..
    - goshx 6y ago
      No, he doesn't. The car doesn't let you do this either.
- djohnston 6y ago
  Safer doesn't mean invincible. Even if there are arguments to be had on the data, zero people are saying rig your car to drive with no one in the front seat and have a great time.