There already is value given for not limiting growth - it is called growth and absence of pronlems. The main issue is that they don't see them. One dumb top of

There already is value given for not limiting growth - it is called growth and absence of pronlems. The main issue is that they don't see them. One dumb top of the head idea is a new development "tax" to existing owners within a certain radius. It is pretty perverse in its self. Hopefully it would be offset by absense of NIMBY costs. Probably not the best concept by any means and had loads of flaws I haven't noticed but it could technically help.