The article linked within the post was much more insightful than the post itself. http://www.realityprime.com/articles/why-microsoft-and-internet-explorer-need

The article linked within the post was much more insightful than the post itself. http://www.realityprime.com/articles/why-microsoft-and-internet-explorer-need-webgl http://www.realityprime.com/articles/why-microsoft-and-inter... It is however, incorrectly cited in the post as support for the author's argument, which it is not. The Reality Prime article makes the case that it is irrelevant how secure the platform actually is - it will likely come into mainstream use, and Microsoft needs to support it, whether they like it or not. Also, the post fails to mention that there was an official Microsoft response to the vulnerability report, which stated that the vulnerability had been fixed in Silverlight 5.