What evil about paying only what's owed? How is there someone else paying for it exactly? That's like saying saving money is robbing a store of a purchase. Ther

What evil about paying only what's owed? How is there someone else paying for it exactly? That's like saying saving money is robbing a store of a purchase. There's an implication here that someone's unstated or unwritten expectations are an obligation to fulfill and that exercising any options outside of said expectations is/should be a punishable violation.