3 ms·
They aren't doing it for 'the people' obviously. Once you gravitate towards an autocracy it matters a whole lot less why you do things, or who it is supposed to
by oneplane 6y ago
They aren't doing it for 'the people' obviously. Once you gravitate towards an autocracy it matters a whole lot less why you do things, or who it is supposed to be for.
On the other hand, banning things in the digital realm is rather difficult. Unless you go completely offline in practical terms, there is no real way to stop this type of communication.
- LegitShady 6y ago>On the other hand, banning things in the digital realm is rather difficult. Unless you go completely offline in practical terms, there is no real way to stop this type of communication. Alternately all of the transaction history is public and recorded. Once you catch someone you will be able to trace all or their activity semi automatically, and you only need to make a few big examples to teach people what is more risky -turkish jail for financial crimes or not using crypto. The us or China could crash the value of these crypto currencies in a single act. It's a very fragile system.