3 ms·

So, Microsoft, does this mean you are going to kill 3D support in Silverlight, or does it mean you will add WebGL support to Internet Explorer? Or are you goin

So, Microsoft, does this mean you are going to kill 3D support in Silverlight, or does it mean you will add WebGL support to Internet Explorer? Or are you going to fix Silverlight? Oh, you already did? Umm... well, then I guess we better get around to fixing our browsers, rather than putting our feet in our mouths.

windsurfer 15y ago
Microsoft has reported that they fixed silver-light but haven't actually released the fix (for the latest report that I'm assuming you're referring to that was posted on HN yesterday).
- kenjackson 15y ago
  Correct. Silverlight 5 is still in beta. They said that they had fixed the issue and will be part of a future release -- of a product that is currently in beta. You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products.
  - bad_user 15y ago
    You're missing the point - if it's a fundamental architecture flaw that cannot be fixed, then Silverlight in its current (beta) form suffers from the same problems. You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products You can find fixes of open-source projects as soon as they are committed. Microsoft made a bold claim, people are curious about how they fixed Silverlight if indeed they did that. If not a new Silverlight release, than at least write some kind of blog post explaining what's different in Silverlight. But I'd bet this is typical of Microsoft; right hand, meet left hand, please communicate :)
    - deleted 15y ago
      [deleted]
      - deleted 15y ago
        [deleted]
        deleted 15y ago
        [deleted]
    - Athtar 15y ago
      > You can find fixes of open-source projects as soon as they are committed. That might be relevant if it wasn't for the fact that Silverlight is not open source. They are under no obligation to show/blog their fix until they actually release. In fact, they would probably want to withhold it as long as possible if their intent is to damage WebGL.
  - nitrogen 15y ago
    You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products. Chrome does. Every time Ubuntu checks for updates (weekly or more often), there's a new version of Chrome dev channel available.
    - ajg1977 15y ago
      But it's not typical, so what's your point?
      - nitrogen 15y ago
        If it's typical for Chrome, a web browser with a hefty market share, and we're discussing Silverlight, a web technology, it seems highly relevant. If Google can release frequent beta updates to a web technology product with potential GPU-related security holes, why not Microsoft?

windsurfer 15y ago

Microsoft has reported that they fixed silver-light but haven't actually released the fix (for the latest report that I'm assuming you're referring to that was posted on HN yesterday).

kenjackson 15y ago
Correct. Silverlight 5 is still in beta. They said that they had fixed the issue and will be part of a future release -- of a product that is currently in beta. You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products.
- bad_user 15y ago
  You're missing the point - if it's a fundamental architecture flaw that cannot be fixed, then Silverlight in its current (beta) form suffers from the same problems. You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products You can find fixes of open-source projects as soon as they are committed. Microsoft made a bold claim, people are curious about how they fixed Silverlight if indeed they did that. If not a new Silverlight release, than at least write some kind of blog post explaining what's different in Silverlight. But I'd bet this is typical of Microsoft; right hand, meet left hand, please communicate :)
  - deleted 15y ago
    [deleted]
    - deleted 15y ago
      [deleted]
      - deleted 15y ago
        [deleted]
  - Athtar 15y ago
    > You can find fixes of open-source projects as soon as they are committed. That might be relevant if it wasn't for the fact that Silverlight is not open source. They are under no obligation to show/blog their fix until they actually release. In fact, they would probably want to withhold it as long as possible if their intent is to damage WebGL.
- nitrogen 15y ago
  You typically don't rush out fixes for beta versions of products. Chrome does. Every time Ubuntu checks for updates (weekly or more often), there's a new version of Chrome dev channel available.
  - ajg1977 15y ago
    But it's not typical, so what's your point?
    - nitrogen 15y ago
      If it's typical for Chrome, a web browser with a hefty market share, and we're discussing Silverlight, a web technology, it seems highly relevant. If Google can release frequent beta updates to a web technology product with potential GPU-related security holes, why not Microsoft?