4 ms·
Says in the paper they had 337 subjects, so we'll have to match them with 337 irrelevant anecdotes so that we too can be scientists
by dw-im-here 5y ago
Says in the paper they had 337 subjects, so we'll have to match them with 337 irrelevant anecdotes so that we too can be scientists
- anon_tor_12345 5y agoyou think that's bad? this paper http://pdinda.org/Papers/ipdps18.pdf http://pdinda.org/Papers/ipdps18.pdf surveyed ~150 and concluded therefrom. the more hilarious thing being that they drew conclusion completely unscientifically i.e. by just interpreting vague plots (i.e. without performing t-tests or anything like that).
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- nuclearnice1 5y ago“But choosing good meaningful names is hard. We perform a sequence of experiments in which a total of *334 subjects* are required to choose names in given programming scenarios.”