4 ms·
In many countries it wouldn't have been allowed to fire him. I wonder how it'd been to be a manager, if he couldn't be fired, and he continued contacting the C
by cutemonster 6y ago
In many countries it wouldn't have been allowed to fire him.
I wonder how it'd been to be a manager, if he couldn't be fired, and he continued contacting the CEO etc saying you (GGP, whirlingdervish the throwaway) weren't any good at your job.
I guess eventually I'd quit (if I was in GGPs position and couldn't do much about it), and he'd become the manager in my place, if the plan hadn't been to hire another one.
- kubanczyk 6y ago> In many countries it wouldn't have been allowed to fire him. I'm in one of these countries. If they have a cause that cannot be legally used to terminate an employee, they just look long and hard for any other misdemeanors and fire them as fast as they gather any plausible "evidence". Creative types can also actively put an employee into a checkmate, i.e. a position where no move or any move is a fireable offense. In this case it could be as simple as identifying any part of that email as a defamation.
- cutemonster 6y agoCompare that unfortunate workplace "culture" (until the person eventually leaves / gets fired), with this article about psychological safety: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26860743 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26860743 I wonder if the lawmakers having made it almost impossible to fire someone, then damages the psychological safety in the company, in that the managers have to start looking for mistakes someone did and using it against him/her. I'd guess this sends bad vibes to the whole team. Makes me wonder if this holds countries like, was is France?, back, when it comes to startups and innovation, hmm