10 ms·
I'm reading the same new from other sources in Spanish. I didn't saw anything about making weapons in 30 minutes. Instead I read that they have a lot of suprema
by Zardoz84 6y ago
I'm reading the same new from other sources in Spanish. I didn't saw anything about making weapons in 30 minutes. Instead I read that they have a lot of supremacist and fascist material, manuals about how make bombs, many chemical products that could be used for weapons, etc.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/elpais.com/espana/2021-04-18/la-policia-desmantela-en-tenerife-el-primer-taller-ilegal-de-impresion-de-armas-3d-en-espana.html%3foutputType=amp https://www.google.com/amp/s/elpais.com/espana/2021-04-18/la...
- NoImmatureAdHom 6y agoSo it seems like we should blame Reuters for trying to exploit an uninformed audience for clicks, rather than blaming the Spanish National Police.
- giantg2 6y agoWhat if Reuters is part of the uninformed public (on this topic/situation) and is being exploited by the police?
- NoImmatureAdHom 6y agoIt's possible, but I'd argue it's sort of their job to not be part of the uninformed public.
- washadjeffmad 6y agoReuters' job is to sell "news", which can be anything anyone* pays them to distribute. It's harmful to conflate clickbait and stories with journalism. *Only trusted corporate or political partners. They have some standards.
- giantg2 6y agoIn theory, I agree. I've seen plenty of mainstream media stories that have incorrect facts. Some of this might just be human - we all make occasional mistakes. Some of them seem to require being uninformed or intentional, especially when they decline to correct mistakes or they are critical to their central point.