3 ms·
There is an established consensus that cigarettes are bad for kids. Sure, parents should keep parenting, but it’s acceptable to create messaging that Instagram
by jcpst 6y ago
There is an established consensus that cigarettes are bad for kids. Sure, parents should keep parenting, but it’s acceptable to create messaging that Instagram is bad for children. It’s a public health issue.
No one is creating messaging that bicycles are bad for kids. There are safety guidelines for using bicycles.
There is no need for safety guidelines for cigarettes or Instagram for children, because there’s no benefit for children to use those things.
- AmericanChopper 6y ago> It’s a public health issue. It’s really just a parenting issue. > There is no need for safety guidelines for cigarettes or Instagram for children, because there’s no benefit for children to use those things. It’s a social tool, there’s plenty of risk for harm with any form of socialization, especially with children. There’s also plenty of benefit for children to have with socialization, so your comments here just seem very obviously wrong to me. If you’re a parent you may find those risks to be unacceptable. Especially if you’re a parent who relies on other parties to do most of your parenting for you. But all the arguments put forward here just make the claim that there’s a risk for harm, and as such instagram must be comparably harmful to cigarettes. This is simply an anti-rational argument. It’s a risk decision, just like all the other risk decisions parents make for their children.
- jcpst 6y agoIt is comparably harmful to cigarettes. It is not for children. Instagram is not a social tool. Instagram is a commercial marketing tool where the users are the product being sold, at the whims of the latest behavioral psychology tactics. It is thinly veiled as a social tool. This is not comparable to typical socialization in children.