4 ms·
I'm surprised there isn't more discussion on this. That's more than 4x more for managers than engineers.
by sillysaurusx 6y ago
I'm surprised there isn't more discussion on this. That's more than 4x more for managers than engineers.
- fuzzythinker 6y agoYes, 4x is a big gap, not just % wise, but dollar wise too. I'm sure they don't talk about it during the interview. But if somehow that information slipped in during interview, I would honestly just thank them for the time and walk out because I would never work for a company that believes in the large gap of the output of the 2 groups.
- slyall 6y agoIt's a standard sort of thing. The idea is that a non-manager has minimal ability to affect the company's bottom line. While those further up have the ability (and now have the incentive) to affect the profit of their division or the whole company. So a worker gets 100k with a 10% bonus, his boss gets $120k with a 40 percent bonus etc. In a good year the boss will get almost twice the worker but in a bad year he will make just 20% more.
- Thorrez 6y ago0.0004% is 4x 0.0001%. If it's a small amount then 4x really doesn't matter.
- hagy 6y agoThe compensation progression for a manager generally consists of a slow (if any growth) in base salary and most compensation increases come from stock and bonus. I believe this is generally the same for high level ICs. Some companies make it explicit that there is an IC level that corresponds to each manager level and both have the same compensation structure.