3 ms·
I don’t have data to accept your generalization, and I think you’re arguing a strawman. Teaching kids financial literacy can help them make better informed choi
by tracer4201 5y ago
I don’t have data to accept your generalization, and I think you’re arguing a strawman. Teaching kids financial literacy can help them make better informed choices, and for some of them, they might learn concepts like investing and planning for their future earlier in life as opposed to late.
- jimmyvalmer 5y agoThe strawman reared its empty head earlier regarding "financial literacy" (a vacuous notion) as a nostrum for pointless student debt. For whatever reason, you seem to think formalizing "buy low, sell high" and "keep your savings on the right side of zero" would somehow deter the general population from doing the opposite, rather than two things which would: learning a trade and mastering basic math.
- tracer4201 5y ago> you seem to think formalizing "buy low, sell high" and "keep your savings on the right side of zero" would somehow deter the general population from doing the opposite I’d be happy to provide specifics on what I “think”, but I’m not sure if it would be a productive conversation. You keep responding in bad faith. No where did I write anything about buying low and selling high or “keeping your savings on the right side of zero”. I don’t even know what that means. Can you please show me where I wrote that? It seems like you’re against teaching children financial literacy, and you don’t actually care to listen or understand what it might even mean. Your definition is teaching kids “buy low, sell high” - you are confidently uninformed on the topic. In all seriousness, your behavior in jumping to conclusions about what the other person is saying and trying to tell them they’re wrong without even hearing them out — this is cyber bullying. I’m going to stop engaging with you here, full stop.