It is a work of human visual perception at work. Somehow you mind chooses how to interpret sensations from a retina, and shows you one of women. Then you mind c

It is a work of human visual perception at work. Somehow you mind chooses how to interpret sensations from a retina, and shows you one of women. Then you mind chooses to switch interpretations and you see the other one. Both interpretation are somewhere in memory. So it may be connected with this research. Like with those chords in a research. Mice hear one chord, and by association from memory it expects other chord. But instead it hears some third chord. Expected and unexpected chords have perpendicular representation, if I understood correctly. Here you see a picture, and expects one interpretation or other. You have memory of both, but you get just one. Possibly it doesn't apply, I do not know. I'm trying to understand it. The obvious step is to make a prediction from a theory, should interpretations oscillate, if it has something to do with perpendicularity of representation in neurons? When I hear another chord instead of a predicted one, do prediction and sensations oscillate? I'm not quick enough to judge based on a subjective experience.