> Though I don't think the font is correct. As much as I love the authenticity the site would probably be a lot less readable/usable if it exactly simulated th

> Though I don't think the font is correct. As much as I love the authenticity the site would probably be a lot less readable/usable if it exactly simulated the rendering of the original bitmap MS Sans Serif. Old bitmap font glyphs were manually drawn per-size and were generally expected to be viewed on a CRT where the inherent characteristics of the display gave a kind of ClearType-esque blurring that would be expected by font designers. MS Sans Serif was replaced with an OpenType version of itself (now known as "Microsoft Sans Serif") in Win2k but then you have the copyright issue of redistributing it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Sans_Serif https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Sans_Serif