4 ms·
You argue that spacing produces clutter, but I completely disagree. Clutter is shoving tons of information together without spacing.
by pointlessjon 15y ago
You argue that spacing produces clutter, but I completely disagree. Clutter is shoving tons of information together without spacing.
- dchest 15y agoYou argue that spacing produces clutter "You argue"? Clutter means (let me open the dictionary) "a collection of things lying about in an untidy mass". I never said only spacing produces clutter. Either I'm not explaining myself clearly or you read something that was not in my comment (this is called a strawman, right?)
- pointlessjon 15y agoI never said you are completely, objectively wrong. I just disagreed with a point.. On that note, I see nothing untidy. No hostility meant by "you argue". You provided a critique, an argument. I'd open the dictionary... ;)
- dchest 15y agoYou disagreed with the point which I never made ("spacing produces clutter"), putting words into my mouth ("you argue").
- bonch 15y agoYou mentioned visual clutter, and then your first bullet point was about too much spacing. Clutter--according to the OS X dictionary you cited earlier--refers to a jumble or tangle of items, implying that they are close together. That's the discrepancy he was referring to. His posts were completely non-hostile, so aren't you overreacting?
- bonch 15y agoYou come off as far more angry than is warranted for this conversation.