3 ms·
he was how old when he was in Geneve? 23? Doubt that any kind of training made him an experienced operative. He was still a kid and hardly the Jason Bourne peop
by DyslexicAtheist 6y ago
he was how old when he was in Geneve? 23? Doubt that any kind of training made him an experienced operative. He was still a kid and hardly the Jason Bourne people make him out to be. I'm not saying his leaks didn't provide huge value but it is more plausible that he wasn't fully aware of all the impact that he claims he had knowledge of back then today (or what people attribute him with).
- sneak 6y agoI don't think someone needs to be Jason Bourne to have come to the conclusion in the 73 years of the CIA's operational history that they assassinate people who risk their large-scale projects' secrecy. This feels like a strawman to cling to the idea that being a US citizen means that the CIA won't assassinate you for being inconvenient, which has been literally and directly claimed, at least twice, by someone from the actual CIA. Indeed, the reason you even know the name Jason Bourne, or the reason those movies work, is because of the generation-long history and reputation of the US military intelligence services to break the law flagrantly in many countries with no meaningful consequences. We don't have to suspend disbelief to engage with the idea that there is a section of government with staff who can kill anyone they deem needs killing.