"Anything can be valued at anything" is not an argument. It's just some weird rhetoric you're using to somehow show a parallel between BTC and Stocks. The mat

"Anything can be valued at anything" is not an argument. It's just some weird rhetoric you're using to somehow show a parallel between BTC and Stocks. The material issue here is that stocks can be rationally valued by determining the underlying value of the implied asset ownership - and mostly are - whereas BTC cannot. That someone can pay $1 Trillion for a pair of shoes, a BTC, or an Amazon shares is not relevant.