3 ms·
I don't think they ignored it? Says it was addressed. I think it was OK to dispel the implication that the elaborate supply chain attack was allowed in the firs
by ridaj 5y ago
I don't think they ignored it? Says it was addressed. I think it was OK to dispel the implication that the elaborate supply chain attack was allowed in the first place by sloppy pw practices. You don't want that to be the takeaway and then other companies thinking, well our pw management practice is really good so we don't have to worry about being a victim so much
- rjzzleep 5y agoThey did ignore it. I think it was over a year actually. I don't feel like looking it up right now but it was also discussed in another submission. Whatever the actual number was it was VERY long.