4 ms·

Yes go ahead and innovate around them as they steal your intellectual property. If the Chinese networks / markets were so easy to penetrate as you are suggesti

Yes go ahead and innovate around them as they steal your intellectual property. If the Chinese networks / markets were so easy to penetrate as you are suggesting, why would Google have to spend so much time developing a separate search engine for them to be approved by the CCP? Why wouldn’t they just use the search engines that are already out there? It’s pretty obvious as to why.

dragonelite 5y ago
History has shown that rising powers take what they need to keep their rise going. Just like the UK, France and other send spies to the Netherlands and steal our shipbuilding techniques in 17th century for their own naval rise. The same as the US did with the UK steal factory design keep their own industrial rise going. The Chinese are stealing/buying technical know how to keep their rise going. Like the saying goes, When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do. So when in China, follow the Chinese regulations. The Chinese should do the same when they want to invest here in the EU.
- imiric 5y ago
  Past abuses of power shouldn't justify modern ones, nor should it be normalized and accepted by anyone. It should be criticized and measures put in place so that it doesn't happen again. We can do better as a civilization and learn from past mistakes. The fact China downplays and denies theirs while trying to gaslight the world should be reason enough to never do business with them until this changes and they can be transparent and honest. Unsurprisingly comments like yours come to their defense anytime a news story like this comes along. It's tiring, frankly.
  - sudosysgen 5y ago
    I don't think that taking tech is a mistake or a disaster. Ultimately it works like this - all rising powers have the choice to stay fully shackled by IP and remain subordinate and poor forever, or they can take that IP and provide a better life for their people. Unless there is some alternative there, I just can't fault a country for doing it. Especially when the current top dog is only there because they did it too. The concept of IP is already morally questionable to begin with, now we want to use it to keep half of the world poorer and dependent in perpetuity?
    - imiric 5y ago
      I'm not advocating for IP laws, I agree they're not conducive to prosperity. What I'm against is abuse of trust between business partners, theft of information for political gain or commercial exploitation (counterfeit products), and general dishonesty and deceitfulness. I'm not well versed in game theory, but if tit-for-tat is a winning strategy, it's unreasonable to continue to cooperate with a party that actively tries to screw everyone else over at every turn.

dragonelite 5y ago

History has shown that rising powers take what they need to keep their rise going. Just like the UK, France and other send spies to the Netherlands and steal our shipbuilding techniques in 17th century for their own naval rise. The same as the US did with the UK steal factory design keep their own industrial rise going. The Chinese are stealing/buying technical know how to keep their rise going. Like the saying goes, When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do. So when in China, follow the Chinese regulations. The Chinese should do the same when they want to invest here in the EU.

imiric 5y ago
Past abuses of power shouldn't justify modern ones, nor should it be normalized and accepted by anyone. It should be criticized and measures put in place so that it doesn't happen again. We can do better as a civilization and learn from past mistakes. The fact China downplays and denies theirs while trying to gaslight the world should be reason enough to never do business with them until this changes and they can be transparent and honest. Unsurprisingly comments like yours come to their defense anytime a news story like this comes along. It's tiring, frankly.
- sudosysgen 5y ago
  I don't think that taking tech is a mistake or a disaster. Ultimately it works like this - all rising powers have the choice to stay fully shackled by IP and remain subordinate and poor forever, or they can take that IP and provide a better life for their people. Unless there is some alternative there, I just can't fault a country for doing it. Especially when the current top dog is only there because they did it too. The concept of IP is already morally questionable to begin with, now we want to use it to keep half of the world poorer and dependent in perpetuity?
  - imiric 5y ago
    I'm not advocating for IP laws, I agree they're not conducive to prosperity. What I'm against is abuse of trust between business partners, theft of information for political gain or commercial exploitation (counterfeit products), and general dishonesty and deceitfulness. I'm not well versed in game theory, but if tit-for-tat is a winning strategy, it's unreasonable to continue to cooperate with a party that actively tries to screw everyone else over at every turn.