25 ms·
The title of the article doesn't match the content. The article says it's possible they could have eavesdropped because they have access, but not that they did.
by swinglock 5y ago
The title of the article doesn't match the content. The article says it's possible they could have eavesdropped because they have access, but not that they did.
- akvadrako 5y agoIt does say Huawei also knew which numbers were tapped by police and intelligence services. If that's true it's bad enough. But it sounds like they are just saying Huawei engineers had access to the internal network at certain times for debugging purposes. Which is not surprising at all.
- sam_lowry_ 5y agoOf course they knew, because KPN is unable to run its own network, they outsourced everything. This has been knows for years.
- Ekaros 5y agoThe opposite would be infinitely worse. That is if Huawei were one administering the network. Allowing any government organisation option to wiretap any connection without any knowledge or controls is entirely against western values. Logically police and intelligence services should be ones telling ISPs what to tap. And they should only comply with proper process. Anything else is totalitarianism.