4 ms·
It was a flippant statement, but it’s still more right than your righteous reply. I have experience here, literally with isolation diets for immune issues on s
by nwienert 6y ago
It was a flippant statement, but it’s still more right than your righteous reply.
I have experience here, literally with isolation diets for immune issues on starches, common for immunologists to run, see AIP which can start extreme down to one thing. I had a friend who had to do a super intense version, luckily, mine was quick.
There’s no problem with flippant statements, just bad faith replies that try and pick fights over nothing.
Also didn’t claim benefit. It’s potato. If there were some significant problem we’d have known by now.
- foerbert 6y agoI never said it was bad either. I was specifically taking umbrage with the reasoning provided - X does a lot of Y in their complex thing and gets good results, so lots of Y can't be bad - and tried to be clear about that.
- nwienert 6y ago> claim that the isolated portion will be beneficial > gets good results You claim I said it’s “good”, but I said “can’t be bad” in relation to a short term allergy diet. Your super pedantic bone you picked is based on exaggerating what I said twice and generalizing it out of context, which is funny coming from a pedant.