2 ms·
>currently the most accurate way to measure aging I don't understand what people mean by statements like this. Per the Wiki page, they found something that on
by perl4ever 6y ago
>currently the most accurate way to measure aging
I don't understand what people mean by statements like this. Per the Wiki page, they found something that on average is highly correlated to chronological age.
But in individual cases, it may be off a little or a lot. What tells you this is meaningful information and not random noise? What is the reference point for the "real" age that is not chronological age?
- fao_ 6y ago> But in individual cases, it may be off a little or a lot. What tells you this is meaningful information and not random noise? Because it was more accurate than other data sources we've tried
- perl4ever 6y agoIt appears to me to be "more accurate" because they have defined the discrepancies as more accurate. Why not just define them as inaccuracy?
- chub500 6y agoI just watched an interesting Veritasium on this aspect of aging: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRt7LjqJ45k https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRt7LjqJ45k