Sure, possibly that means the article should viewed a bit skeptically, but ideally that would be done with any source. Here's a parallel article from the BBC a

Sure, possibly that means the article should viewed a bit skeptically, but ideally that would be done with any source. Here's a parallel article from the BBC a day earlier: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589 At a glance I didn't see any discrepancies between them. Do you? If there are actual problems with the article (beyond the reputation of the source) you can email hn@ycombinator.com and probably convince Dan to change the URL.