4 ms·
The way I see FLoC is that it's nothing more than a compromise. This isn't a web standards feature like WebMIDI or WebHID that fulfills the (ever expanding) re
by nonbirithm 6y ago
The way I see FLoC is that it's nothing more than a compromise.
This isn't a web standards feature like WebMIDI or WebHID that fulfills the (ever expanding) requests for features from web developers. It isn't a feature that the average user would ever ask for. It's simply a way for Google's ads business to continue functioning in spite of a web community that is gradually becoming privacy-conscious.
- chmod775 6y ago"Okay, it is true I can do nothing to force you to eat this pile of poo and I have nothing as means of payment, but let's make a compromise: How about you eat half?" How about no, Google? DRM made its way into browsers only barely, and in that case they at least had something people wanted.
- perryizgr8 6y ago> DRM made its way into browsers only barely, and in that case they at least had something people wanted. What did DRM have that people wanted?
- GekkePrutser 6y agoNetflix. People are giving out about browsers and devices not supporting widevine now :(
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]