4 ms·
While I understand your sentiment, I think the primary objective of the filmmaker is to make a good film. Sometimes that means doing something to simply get an
by ghawr 5y ago
While I understand your sentiment, I think the primary objective of the filmmaker is to make a good film. Sometimes that means doing something to simply get an emotional response out of it. If it’s effective in giving people a deeper appreciation of the animal and that ecosystem, then I'd argue it was a good choice and not at all misguided as you're portraying it.
- sneak 5y agoJust because a film can make a large positive emotional response doesn't mean it was a good film, just as a film that can make a large negative emotional response is a bad film. I think GP was criticizing the cheap, low-hanging feelgood duct taped onto the end. It doesn't make the film better.
- sneak 5y agoedit: *is not a bad film