First, it’s great you took that animal in and I find no fault with the thing your doing. It is normal in this time. > Also, it's actually work for me to do thi

First, it’s great you took that animal in and I find no fault with the thing your doing. It is normal in this time. > Also, it's actually work for me to do this. This is the key point. It is work to give a cat outdoor experiences but not allow the cat to roam freely. The same goes for having a dog. But there is a general acceptance that the two animals should be treated completely differently. A wild dog would also not take well to indoor only life. However, the concept of adopting a feral dog is far less familiar because dogs are generally not allowed to roam cities unattended. (In the US at least) As for not caring about the animal, I need to clarify: They must care differently about that animal. It is more like the relationship between a farmer and farm animals than a companion relationship you might see dramatized in a cat food commercial. The reason I say that is because it is far more likely an “outdoor” cat will be eaten by a predator or hit by a car. The cat “owner” accepts letting the cat live it’s best life is more important than protecting it against these dangers that is a choice. So I suppose these folks care differently than other people, because the relationship is different.