I think the better question to ask is not who is doing better, but who is doing it right. You can throw on a lidar and radar on a car, along with a database of

I think the better question to ask is not who is doing better, but who is doing it right. You can throw on a lidar and radar on a car, along with a database of high res maps to get next to perfect 3d representation and path generation. That tech has been around for a while. On the other hand, a camera based system is cheap, through the nature of it being specifically imperfect, you have to make systems that work with imperfect data, which make them more robust.