4 ms·
This reminds me of the question "Why has no one made a better Board Game Geek?" (https://boardgamegeek.com/ https://boardgamegeek.com/). It actually is slowly g
by irrational 6y ago
This reminds me of the question "Why has no one made a better Board Game Geek?" (https://boardgamegeek.com/ https://boardgamegeek.com/). It actually is slowly getting better now, but it is still shockingly stuck with a UI/UX from the very early 2000s.
Another website, Board Game Atlas (https://www.boardgameatlas.com/ https://www.boardgameatlas.com/) was launched a year or two ago to compete with Board Game Geek but hasn't really caught on, despite having a superior UI/UX and some killer features.
Why has it not caught on? Mainly because everyone is already using Board Game Geek. That is where the community is so unless everyone moves over en masse it probably isn't going to happen.
However! After Board Game Atlas was launched, Board Game Geek suddenly started updating their UI/UX.
Here you can see the pre-Board Game Atlas homepage:
https://boardgamegeek.com/dashboard https://boardgamegeek.com/dashboard
Here you can see the post-Board Game Atlas homepage:
https://boardgamegeek.com/ https://boardgamegeek.com/
They've made similar improvements for interior pages. Up until very recently the interior pages were totally unusable on mobile (the forums are still terrible), but now they are mostly usable.
My take away is this, if you want Goodreads to have good UI/UX, create a competing website that does the same thing as Goodreads with good UI/UX. When Goodreads feels threatened by the new site, even if people are not moving over to it en masse, they will start to find the time and money to fix their own UI/UX problems. Though, it may take awhile, BGG has been improving, but it is taking a long long long time. A shockingly long time.
- hipnoizz 6y agoWell, it is definitely true that BGG UI feels dated and disjointed, and if Board Game Atlas triggered some reaction on BGG side then great. I don't find BGA UI that much better. Cleaner, more 'modern' - yeah... which includes a lots of white space and rather low information density. On BGG I visit some forums, read reviews for games I'm interested in and browse the files section - even if UI could be improved here it is usable enough and the volume of information makes up for all the deficiencies, at least for me. And contrary to Goodreads BGG seems to have working search ;-)
- donio 6y agoI actually like the current BGG UI a lot. It certainly has its quirks but it could be SO MUCH worse. It is definitely more enjoyable to use than most "modern" websites out there. Clear textual links rather than figuring out mystery buttons, pages load reasonably fast (including those with very large lists) and it stays responsive too rather than slowly murdering the browser. I am all for improving it but I really hope that it doesn't get ruined in the name of UX.