3 ms·
The sad thing about this type of article is that we have a perfectly legitimate case for people whose work happens to involve sex - in a fully responsible and m
by rglullis 6y ago
The sad thing about this type of article is that we have a perfectly legitimate case for people whose work happens to involve sex - in a fully responsible and measured way - and it becomes as a hook to make a shallow "all sex work should be normalized".
> What difference does it honestly make?
Is that a cheap rhetorical question or do you don't see the moral issues of legalized prostitution?
Just to start with the basics: how "incentivized" is someone who grew up with poverty and/or abuse and started prostituting themselves? How can we prevent young vulnerable girls getting lured into it? What is a woman that entered into the oldest profession to do after she reached an age where she is no longer attractive and can not compete with the hordes of young girls who see it as a way to make a lot of money for little "work"?
Let's think a bit further: how about the health and their own relationship with sex for a woman that turned to prostitution? Don't you think that dealing with all sorts of Johns (who are likely to have their own issues when relating to sex) leads into prostitutes having their own sex issues?
"Well, porn has faced the same challenges, got regulated and now it's a huge industry", you might say. Yes, it's true. The questions are then: do you really want to turn everything into an "industry"? Are we better of as a society after that porn became something to be mass-produced and mass-consumed? For every Mia Khalifa that managed to turn her life around, how many other women got ground up by a life-changing decision they would make when so young? Do we want to have even more of the political-bureaucratic machine responsible in telling us what is acceptable and what is not?
> If prostitution were legal and accepted in the USA
Plenty of countries where it is legal and it still doesn't hold a candle to drinking or smoking.
- endisneigh 6y agoThe logic you use about prostitution can be used for anything that harms someone. So I'm not really sure what your point is. Should we ban all things that harm people? Mining, construction, gambling, drinking, tobacco, etc. etc. etc. > Do we want to have even more of the political-bureaucratic machine responsible in telling us what is acceptable and what is not? What's your answer to this?
- rglullis 6y ago> Should we ban all things that harm people? Who said anything about "banning"? My objection is to this equivalence between sex and sex work and the dismissal of any moral values related to it. > What's your answer to this? The liberal in me will say "Decriminalization and harm-reduction", the conservative in me will add "as long as you always focus on reducing the activity and always look at these as problems that society should treat as something to eradicate (even if impossible)". Legalization and this mentality of "people do it anyway, so let's just regulate it" only leads to a false feeling that the problem is not existent anymore, does not make the lives of those affected by the broken system any better, makes us complacent and leads to an even worse situation than the one we started with.