> The best argument against it is: it's very hard to enforce it on everybody internationally, and if one country adopts it unilaterally, then production just mo

> The best argument against it is: it's very hard to enforce it on everybody internationally, and if one country adopts it unilaterally, then production just moves to another country So tax imports (including the carbon cost of shipping) It would likely require agreement between the US and EU to shift enough of the global consumer market to actually care, but with Poland and Texas that doesn't seem likely.