3 ms·
The anti-human-equivalent AI argument was really strange. When you cut out the irrelevant evolutionary stuff and avoid the segue into ethics, he is arguing that
by wzdd 15y ago
The anti-human-equivalent AI argument was really strange. When you cut out the irrelevant evolutionary stuff and avoid the segue into ethics, he is arguing that we won't have human-level AI in machines because humans don't want to design machines that behave like humans. But in fact that is exactly what many people want to do. Very incoherent argument.