According to another poster, there were in fact here other proposals and crypto was a small part of it. And that small part was, quoting the text: > One of the

According to another poster, there were in fact here other proposals and crypto was a small part of it. And that small part was, quoting the text: > One of the specific initiatives under the EU Internet Forum in 2020 is the creation of a technical expert process to map and assess possible solutions which could allow companies to detect and report child sexual abuse in end-to-end encrypted electronic communications, in full respect of fundamental rights and without creating new vulnerabilities criminals could exploit. Technical experts from academia, industry, public authorities and civil society organisations will examine possible solutions focused on the device, the server and the encryption protocol that could ensure the privacy and security of electronic communications and the protection of children from sexual abuse and sexual exploitation. So -- you may say that you know that this project is hopeless and a foregone conclusion. But will every politician trust that -- or will they make a panel of experts to explore solutions and tell them for sure that you can't meaningfully limit encryption in the first place, and even if you did you can't do it without violating privacy, as is presumed here? Don't attribute to malice what can be attributed to technical ignorance.